|
THE ISLAND OF ELEPHANTINE IN SOUTHERN EGYPT:
Elephantine is a large island in the Nile
River in Southern Egypt, approximately
500miles south of Cairo, and just north of the
great Aswan Dam that has tamed the Nile.(see
MAP) It is just across the river from
the ancient city of Aswan. In his book, Archives
from Elephantine, Bezalal
Porten describes the beautiful scenery
surrounding the island, "Sailing up the Nile one notices that the
fertile land
[of Egypt]
dwindles to a mere strip. The
surrounding country side is relatively so arid that the ‘blossoming
Isle' of Elephantine takes on a verdue and freshness by contrast.
Yet its climate is remarkably dry." (Porten p. 36)
"Due to the cataract rapids [and falls] surrounding Elephantine, navigation northward was limited to small
vessels. It would have taken about four
days by boat to negotiate this area, and was possible only during the season
when the Nile was high. This made Elephantine
a strategic military point since any boat traffic would have had to pass close
to the island of Elephantine. The fortress at Elephantine served as the southern border and was
garrisoned for protection of the Egyptian Empire. Over the centuries many
colonies were intermittently maintained on the island, including a Jewish
Temple side by side with a temple to Chnum, [the Ram Headed God of the Egyptians]."
(Clayton p. 32)
MODERN BIAS AND THE JAREDITE AND ABRAHAMIC PERIODS:
The history and records from Elephantine shed light on
multiple subjects of interest to the LDS, touching as they do upon the Jaredite
period, the Abrahamic period, the periods of Joseph and Moses in Egypt, the
loss of the Ten Tribes and especially the time of Lehi, thus it sheds light on
the Book of Mormon, the Pearl of Great Price and the Book of Abraham and the
mummies and records Joseph Smith obtained in 1835, but especially on the names
found in the book of Mormon providing Onomastic details of the names. "The point of view from which we have become
accustomed to study this period is that of those who edited and preserved the
Old Testament. This BIAS has been compounded by the preferences of many MODERN
expositors, especially Protestant, which have led to the work of the Chronicler
and the Priestly writer being NEGLECTED in favor of the ‘Prophetic' religion and the emphasis upon
the Deuteronomists' salvation history.
EVIDENCE FROM ELEPHANTINE [the Archives], from the Samartian tradition [found in the Dead Sea Scrolls], and from the Psuedepigraph [110 texts are now
represented] has made it clear that the Old Testament gives but ONE VIEW of the
situation, and our own minds are predisposed in a certain direction from the
moment we start to label and Define what happened." (Baker p. 184) Another view
is required.
UNDERSTANDING ELEPHANTINE
AND ITS PRESENT SIGNIFICANCE:
The discoveries at Elephantine
are going to figure in many future studies of this series, so we need to take
an in depth look at Elephantine.
In order to understand the importance of Elephantine
we need some background in the history of the Nile
River region of Egypt,
including some biblical data. "The destruction of Jewish Independence
commenced
about 722 BC ...The First Dispersions of the Jews occurred 722-586 BC."
(Gilbert
pp. 6-8) The dispersions began with the
Assyrian conquest and removal of the 10 tribes of Israel. A little more
than a
century later the Babylonian conquest occurred with at least two
deportations
into Mesopotamia and Persia. About 722 B.C. "foreign powers
...more united
and more ambitious than Egypt
were moving toward the domination of that land [Palestine].
The Assyrians were consolidating their position in Syria-Palestine
before the attack upon Egypt
across the difficult Sinai desert. Tiglath-Piliser ...in Syria
...penetrated as far South as Gaza. Sargon II took Samaria, overthrew
the kingdom of Israel...defeated
the Egyptians at Raphia. Sennacherib captured cities of Judah ...
besieged the Jerusalem of Hezekiah. His
general assured the people of that city that their reliance upon the
Pharaoh of
Egypt was a trust in a ‘broken reed,' which could only injure him who
leaned
upon it. (Isa. 36:6) Sennacherib
defeated the Egyptians ...at Eltekeh in Southern Palestine in 700
B.C...in 688 ...the
Assyrian king moved ...to Pulsium on the Egyptian frontier...his
successful advance
was cut short by Plague (Isa 37:36)...Esarahaddon in 671 BC penetrated
to Egypt,
captured Memphis...sent Tirhakah in flight to the South...Ethiopian
claim to the
rule of all Egypt was denied...many small Delta dynasties were
confirmed in their
local rule...as Assyrian vassals....later Tirhakah's nephew Tanutamon
(664-653)
came out of Cush, recaptured Memphis, and briefly defied the
Assyrians. He was no match for Ashurbanipal...who ...won
back Memphis [and] marched as far South as Thebes and subdued that
mighty city. Thereafter the Ethiopians remained in their distant
Southern
province." (Buttrick p. 54) Most of these names and events are familiar
to
those who have studied the biblical record from Isaiah to Jeremiah.
Gilbert
shows the dispersion of Jews beginning in 722 included a movement into
Egypt and up the Nile, to the south, to Elephantine
and beyond, where they remained until about 270 BC. (Gilbert pp.
6-8)
A GREAT RENAISSANCE AND RESTORATION UNDER THE SAITIC
DYNASTY:
An extremely critical time for Egypt was about 650 BC. "Esarhaddon
had recognized certain small princes of Lower Egypt
as legitimate rulers of city-states.
Among them was a family at SAIS
in the West Central Delta. "the defeat of Ethiopia
by the Saite Egyptian dynasty in the early seventh century signaled changes in Egypt
and potentially the end of Assyrian power there." (Sweeny p. 34) "A later member of this family, Psamtik or
Psammetichus l, (663-609 BC), took advantage of the loose Assyrian sponsorship
to enlarge his power and claim the rule of all Egypt. The Twenty-sixth Dynasty
(663-525) BC) is also called the SAITIC
period ...the RENAISSANCE...or RESTORATION." (Buttrich pp. 83-84) A more recent study of the chronology places
the Saitic at 672-525 BC, only a little difference. (see Gee p. 24) This Renaissance
or Restoration needs to be studied
in greater detail.
THE DOCTRINES IN AN ANCIENT WORM-EATEN PAPYRUS:
Of great importance is the part played by Shabako [Sabacon] (716-702 BC) who
expanded the "REVIVAL of OLD Egyptian TRADITIONS, delving into whatever temple
records could be found, or inventing them if necessary. An important relic of this time is the ‘SHABAKA STONE', a slab of [black granite, probably from Elephantine] 4.5 feet (l.37 m) long, [three feet wide,
and seven feet high and inscribed on two sides], now in the British Museum.
[where it was brought in 1805] Its
surface is much abraded and deeply scored from having been used at a later date
as a millstone. The text on it states
that it is a COPY taken from an ANCIENT ‘WORM-EATEN PAPYRUS' discovered at Memphis [in the Old
White Temple]
and recounting the Memphite theology of the creator gods [at a very early
period in Egyptian history]." (Clayton p. 192) It took more than 100 years to
translate; it had been written backwards. These doctrines predate the
Unification of Egypt under Narmer [or before 3200 B.C.] Would these ancient documents reflect the
teachings of Adam and others from 4000 to 3200 BC?
"At a recent conference on reconstructing Israelite history
held in Rome, [in 2004] the so-called Biblical Minimalist position was upheld
by a number of prominent Scholars ... ‘Biblical archaeology' becomes
useless...[the] academic conference...highlighted the proposition of [such]
scholars who think the Bible has little or no reliable history." (Shanks
pp.16-17) With the abundance of modern revelation and new scripture, from the
LDS standpoint the position of the minimalists is on shaky ground. The Shabaka Stone would be within the middle or even early years of the life
span of Adam. "The Shabako Stone comes from Erman [a German scholar Nibley
respects] at Berlin.
He called it the Shabako Text because it was [copied] by King Shabako. The
great study of it is by Sethe in 1929, and others have come out since." (Nibley
3, Lecture Eight p. 2) Nibley himself gives it great credence and discusses it
in detail. His results will be in his
forth-coming study of ‘ONE ETERNAL ROUND'. "Every time they founded a new
dynasty, they would do the same thing; RENEW
THE THOLOGY, give a new version of
the CREATION STORY [or just copy the old version]...[Shabako] said he was going
to RENEW it, so he went back to the
old temple [The Old White Temple] that was built to celebrate the founding of
the first dynasty in Egypt at the beginning of civilization, 3200-3150 BC. It
was very old then [written on papyrus] we find out...It was secret; it was given
to only elect people, only those who were qualified and had recommends could see
it." (Nibley 3, Lecture Eight p. 2-4)
How secret was it? Check the explanation for the Facsimile From the Book of
Abraham, No. 2.
THE RECORDS OF ABRAHAM PRESERVED:
Many monuments after Shabako and during the Saitic Dynasty
especially are COPIED ancient art forms and inscriptions. "It is at time difficult to be absolutely
sure whether a statue or relief is a Saite REVIVAL piece or something MUCH
OLDER." (Clayton p. 195). The
implications for the antiquity of Mormon Doctrine are clear. To track the
origins of these ancient documents from their inception down until they were
added to the grave goods of various Egyptians near 300 B.C. (see Gee p.p.
10-11) and from there to their rediscovery about 1818 in a mass burial tomb, and
final destination in the hands of Joseph Smith, is a journey in the miraculous
with tremendous divine intervention that is yet to be fully appreciated.
"Evidently the record of Abraham was left in Egypt...from Abraham's time down to
Joseph's time. Joseph evidently obtained
the record when he was down in Egypt.
He wrote on the same papyrus roll, or probably made another one. Joseph must
have put his record together with Abraham's and that is how the two records
came to be together." (Clark p. 111) The record of Abraham and Joseph must have
been retained in the Old Temples for more than a thousand years before being
recovered and included in this Renaissance
and Restoration near 600 BC. Then
certain families, perhaps related to priestly families, kept the documents
along with others and then when members of that family were buried 300 years or
so later, the documents were included.
When several hundred mummies were recovered from a tomb in Egypt
near Gurneh by Lebolo about 1818 (Christensen p. 18) their history and destiny
was determined, as it had always been. A forth- coming FARMS volume by Kevin
Barney, Astronomy, Papyrus, and Covenant,
will deal with certain aspects of this. Another forth-coming FARMS volume by
Michael Lyon will address "How do Joseph Smith's interpretations match with
those of the ancient Egyptians?" It is
evident that "Ancient Egyptian identifications for various figures found in the
hypocephali [a round inscribed
object placed under the head of the deceased] ...gathered from multiple
hypocephali, shows that most MODERN Egyptological identifications of figures in
hypocephali do NOT MATCH those of
THE ANCIENT EGYPTIANS." (Gee p. 5) Did Joseph Smith get it right the first
time. Those who rant against the Mormon's must now confront this Egyptian
History.
Most of what goes for modern interpretations of Ancient
Egyptian records is based on what changes were made and how accurate records
were transmitted down during the RESTORATION mentioned above. Details of this story are yet to be written,
but John Gee, for FARMS, is working on a
complete book on the historical background of the Book of Abraham, (See FARMS
INSIGHTS Vol 24 2004, pp. 405), which will provide some answers.
WHEN WAS ABRAHAM IN EGYPT? WAS MOSES AT ELEPANTINE?
During the time of King "Ammenemes l, [Ameny or Amenemhet
IV] of the XIIth Dynasty, (about 1991-to 1786 BC), ...Ta-Stis [is the name] of
the lst nome [a province of ancient Egypt] of Upper Egypt, that of which
Elephantine was the capital and where the population was no doubt partly of
Nubian [black] race." (Gardiner p. 123)
Was Abraham in Egypt
during this Dynasty and taught Pharaoh doctrines?
(See Facsimile No. 3 in Book of Abraham) "We may certainly credit Ammenemes l
with the subjugation of Lower Nubia. During
the "Old Kingdom, gold from Nubia
is never mentioned. Perhaps by Dynasty XII the workings to the east of Egypt were
becoming exhausted or else the demands of the Pharaohs were increasing. [some
of these ancient gold mines are still being mined today] Anyhow, from the
middle Kingdom onward Nubia
was the gold-producing country par-excellence ...invasion [into to Egypt] from the south was a perennial dread and
...expeditions to Lower Nubia and the
neighboring deserts now became frequent...there was little or no colonization. A
papyrus lists as many as thirteen fortresses between Elephantine
[at the First Cataract] and Semna at the south end of the Second Cataract. Most
of these have been identified and [surveyed]." (Gardiner p. 132) Moses
himself during his military career was "in command of the Egyptian army. As a
general he defeats the invading Ethiopians and succeeds in conquering their
country." (Noerdlinger p. 20) Could Elephantine have been utilized as a garrison place by
Moses and his armies at one time or another? Did Moses consolidate the
situation politically by marrying the daughter of a Nubian King? His sister Miriam was bent out of shape about
this.
THE EARLY EGYTIAN CIVILIZATIONS:
By 4000 BC civilization centers developed all over the
world. Homo Habilus, man-like
beings, and man like in habit, were hunters and gatherers before 7000 BC, but
something happened world wide about 4000 BC.
In most regions things got off to a small slow start, but as populations
increased, especially between 4000 and 3500 BC, things began to pick up
appreciably. "Then suddenly, within a few centuries between 3200 and 3000 BC,
the scattered tribes that lived along the Nile
were united under one head, ruled by a formal government.... The man who was
tribal leader of Upper Egypt (tradition calls him Menes, perhaps another name
for King Narmer) founded the first of Egypt's 30 dynasties, extended his
control northward and united the country." (Casson p. 51.
THE HYKSOS AND JOSEPH IN EGYPT:
There was a serious interruption in the Old Kingdom about the time
of the beginning of Dynasty XV, 1663
BC. Egypt
was then ruled by the Semitic Kings, Shepherd Kings or Desert
Princes (see Clayton p. 93) from Palestine. Were these
descendents of Shem,
known as the Hyksos or Aamu? Five known kings are identified ruling
[from 1663]
until 1555 BC, they were called Asiatics. Josephus called
them "Shepherd Kings", he was
quoting from Manetho, the Egyptian Historian (Redford
p. 19) but Josephus's data has been corrected by the more recent work
Edited by
Eliezer D. Oren (Oren, xxi). They ruled during an intermediate period,
which
was then followed by the New Kingdom beginning
1570 BC under Ahmose l. The third King in the Hyksos dynasty, Khyan, is
found
in inscriptions on temple walls indicating that the Hyksos had
penetrated and
established their rule over all Egypt
including to the far south. "Kamose's courtiers in replying to him had
maintained that Elephantine was firmly held, and its is evident that he
for the
moment had no anxiety about his Nubian neighbours, nor indeed about any
place south
of the First Cataract as far as Khumn; [so] all his thoughts were
concentrated
upon the expulsion of the Asiatics [Hyksos]." This activity subjugated
Israel. (Gardiner
p. 164) Was the later part of the Hyksos period the time when Joseph,
son of
Jacob was viceroy of Egypt?
Histories of the time at and following Ahmose are a long series of
brief
paragraphs that portray " the havoc into
which the land has been through by the machinations of low-born
adventurers and
Asiatics [descendants of Jacob or Shem] pushing their way into the
Delta...a few
passages ...affirm the part played by foreigners in the restriction of
true
Egyptian territory to Upper Egypt-Elephantine and Thinis being towns
specifically mentioned." (Gardiner pp.
106-107)
THE TEMPLE
OF THE RAM-HEADED GOD-CHNUM:
King ‘Kamose' [Ahmose]...[inscribed a tablet] .. narrating the
early stages of the conflict. [it included]: ... "we are tranquil in our part of Egypt.
Elephantine is strong, and the middle part is with us as far as Cusae."
(Gardiner p. 162)
A temple to the Ram-headed God, Chnum, built on Elephantine
had inscriptions related to Tuthmosis III [1504-1450 BC] The Ram Head of Chnum looks the Ram Head
ornament on the hood of the Dodge Ram Chargers.
Queen Hatshepsut (1492-1483) had painted on the walls of her
funerary temple at Der el-Bahri [across from Karnak] "a splendid scene of ships
bringing two great obelisks of red granite from Elephantine to Karnak...not to be
confused with two others which she placed between the fourth and fifth pylons
in her sixteenth year...only a little short of 100 feet in height, still
standing. ..Even now there is no nobler architectural achievement to be seen in
the whole of Egypt."
(Gardiner p. 180) Luxor and Der el-Bahri were
among my favorite places to visit in Egypt. Elephantine
was greatly exploited for its granite.
THE JEWISH MERCENARIES:
It was during the development of the Saitic Dynasty
(650-525) that [Asiatics] Jewish mercenaries were hired for military purposes.
"the term Aamu, which we translate with rough accuracy as ‘Asiatics' and which
had much earlier served to designate Palestinian captives or hirelings residing
in Egypt
as servants [or mercenaries]." (Gardiner p. 153) Also at this time, "The loyalty of native
Egyptians ...had become doubtful; the purchased support of foreign professional
soldiers seemed to provide a solid base." (Buttrick p. 55)
Therefore, could we conclude that the Elephantine settlement
and the use of Jewish mercenaries would have been known to Lehi? It is apparent that these were troubled
times. "A ship's captain who lived under Prince Neheri tells us that in the
King's business he traveled as far south as Elephantine
and as far north as the papyrus marshes of the Delta, a [difficult] feat."
(Gardiner p. 112) Did these local and regional events escape Lehi? Wouldn't it
seem that as a prophet he knew much more than we now have in the record about
what was going on?
Amenhotep III (1386-1349 BC) had a "long reign of almost 40
years ...one of the most prosperous and stable in Egyptian history...a series of
reliefs [are] in a room on the east side of the temple at Luxor which Amenhotep
built for Amun. The creator god, the
ram-headed Khnum (Chnum) of Elephantine, is
seen fashioning the young king and his ka
(spirit double [or spirit body]) on a potter's wheel." (Clayton p. 114) The spirit body and the physical body looked
similar. The physical body is fashioned after the Spirit Body. Do LDS believe
this?
KING TUTANKHAMUN AND RAMSES 11:
A shift in religion and seat of government brought about by
King Tutankhamun (1334-1325 BC) brought about a decline in both. "the temples
of the gods and goddesses, beginning from Elephantine down to the marshes of
the Delta had fallen into decay, their shrines had fallen into desolation and
become ruins overgrown with weeds, their chapels as though they had never
been." (Gardiner p. 230) King Tut had caused this and more to be inscribed on a
large stele. This was the first eclipse
of Elephantine. The second would take place a
thousand years later.
After the death of King Tut, Ramses (1293-1291 BC) [ the
Pharoah of Moses's time?] said in a prayer inscribed on a stele addressed to
the God Amun..."building for thee great pylons and erecting their flagstaffs
myself, bringing for thee obelisks from Elephantine
[of red and black granite], even being the
stone carrier." (Gardiner pp. 255-256)
For a period of time Elephantine
prospered once again.
"For another important document of this period [Ramses IV
1151-1145 BC] we have to direct our eyes as far southward as Elephantine.
An ill-written but comparatively well-preserved papyrus in the Turin Museum
recalls in language resembling and no less virulent than the Salt Papyrus grave
accusations against a number of person, prominent among whom was a lay priest
of the temple of Chnum [at Elephantine] charged with many thefts, acts of
bribery, and sacrilege, not to mention the inevitable imputations of copulation
with married women...perloining the garments from the temple treasure-house...the
corruptibility of a number of persons, [and] the losses of corn suffered by the
priesthood of Chnum. ...A ship's captain...in the course of nine years [down to
Ramses the V], had stolen a total more than five thousand sacks." (Gardiner pp.
286-287)
ANCIENT TEXTS COPIED AND TRANSMITTED DOWN:
As noted extremely important "trend had already started in
the preceding century, to study the past glories of Egypt and to attempt to reproduced
them. Art [especially religious art] REVERTED to the expressions of the Old and
Middle Kingdoms, entire scenes were COPIED from ancient tomb to adorn the walls
of contemporary tombs; OLD monuments were excavated, restored, and IMITATED;
classical [and religious] literature was studied, with a conscientious attempt
to REPRODUCE it in form and spirit; and officials where clothed with a series
of ancient and now meaningless titles. Where, toward the beginning, this hope
of spiritual encouragement, it produced works of vigor and charm. Later it
became sterile, as the ritualistic search for a past glory in an age that had
little inner glory [and the meaning of much of the old documents was forgotten]."
(Buttrich p. 54) This intense effort to
revert back to ancient literature, ceremonies, and art, at this time, and
ancient religious themes seems not to have been noticed by students of the
Pearl of Great Price and the Book of Abraham, except by Nibley, but that seems
to be changing.
The revival and imitation of ancient beliefs and teachings
would have then been transmitted down from this time to those a few centuries
later [about 300 BC] who had the collection of mummy materials that Joseph
Smith obtained in 1835 some of which were later found by the Coptic Scholar
Atiya [who had taught at BYU] in the Metropolitan Museum of Art in 1969, and
identified as belonging to various owners
known to have lived shortly after the establishment of the Saitic
Dynasties 27 to 30. (Gee pp. 11-12, 24). It seems that the various scrolls and
fragments that made up the documents obtained by Joseph Smith ended up in tombs
of various Egyptians during the Ptolemaic Dynasty which began about 310
BC. Was what Joseph obtained at the time
of the purchase of the mummies at Kirtland in 1835, have been, in part at least, handed down
copies, perhaps even originals, of ancient doctrines made or preserved at the time of this great RENAISSANCE
and transmitted down through the centuries to end up in Joseph's hands by
divine intervention?
"It is in the Saite dynasty that the ancient titles of the
nobility were revived, that their sculptures and reliefs were
DELIBERATELY
COPIED from those of the OLD Kingdom, and that their
tombs were inscribed with extracts from the Pyramid Texts. From that
time
onward there is a marked increase in Egyptian religiosity." (Gardiner
p. 345)
"Another marked feature of the Saitic period was the strong influence
of
foreigners in Egypt. The commercial interest of the dynasty was
strong...Phoenician merchants were welcomed in the Delta...exiles from
Asia were
granted asylum in Egypt.
In the old Egyptian cities sections were designated for Greek merchants
and artisans...in
the W. Delta an entire market city, Naucratis was assigned to
the Greeks. Furthermore, the power of this dynasty was maintained by
foreign
mercenaries. Around the person of the Pharaoh himself there were
...Ionian and
Carian Greeks, [but also Hebrews] for the most part purchased support
of
foreign professional soldiers seemed to provide a solid base [for
security].
This reliance upon foreign mercenaries continued throughout the
[Saitic]
dynasty, despite a mutiny and attempted desertion of the Greeks under
Hophra."
(Buttrich p. 54) The prophecies of Amos nearly a century earlier were
being
fulfilled, and Jews and others were on the move. In 721 the Ten Tribes
vanished, Isaiah was one of the prophets of the times. Hophra
tried to stir up Judah in revolt against Babylon "and thus was a
major factor toward the fall
of Jerusalem
and the Babylonian captivity." (Buttrich
p. 55) The Saites "in 654 BC forced the
divine votress of Amon to adopt the daughter of Pasmmetichus l and thus
secured
a Saitic agent in the Southland." (Buttrich p,. 55) This required
mercenaries to protect the
southern borders. Available at that time
were Jewish mercenaries having departed the troubled region of
Jerusalem
and Palestine.
A JEWISH TEMPLE NEAR THE TEMPLE OF CHNUM IN ELEPEHANTINE:
The weakening of Pharaonic Power began during the Third
Intermediate Period 1069-525 BC. King
Tanutamun (664-656) descended out of Nubia
practically unopposed and "faring downstream, he did a similar homage to Chnum
of Elephantine and then to Amen-Re at Thebes."
(Gardiner p. 338) Therefore a long
existing temple to the Ram-headed god, Chnum was alive and doing well at Elephantine just before the time the Jewish Garrison
would be established, and where later they would build their temple to Jehovah.
This would create considerable friction.
It seems that "A
revival of Egypt's
ancient glory involved ... a military effort to extend the state.
[About 600 BC]
Greek mercenaries were sent south to the Second Cataract on a
conquering
expedition. But it was particularly in Asia that the dynasty attempted
to
regain power....Psammetichus l [with the help of Ionians and Carians
mercenaries
] invaded Palestine and laid siege to Ashdod. "Greek
inscriptions carved upon on of the colossus of Ramses II at Abu Simbel
[near Aswan] in translation reeds: ‘When King Psammetichus came
to Elephantine, this was written by those who
sailed with Psammetichus the son of Theocles, and they came beyond
Kerkis as
far as the river permits'." (Gardiner p. 349).
His successor was even more vigorous campaigning ambitious in Palestine
and Syria,
and by tradition was industrious in attempts to improve Egypt's
waterways and sea trade.
Neco's [Necho] decisive defeat by the crown prince of Babylonia,
Nebuchadrezzar, at Carchemish in 605 BC for a time quieted
Egypt's
ambitions in Asia. ...the Dynasty family entered
in internecine family struggles for power and laid Egypt open to the
Persian
conquest. Syrians and Jews had poured
into the country, the latter forming a colony at Elephantine
where [after 630 BC] they were permitted to build a temple to their god
Yahu,
the Jehovah of our Authorized Version." (Gardiner p. 346)
"Garrisons had to be maintained on both the
western and the southern fronts; Herodotus (11:30) reports such
garrisons ‘at
Daphnae of Pelusium, another towards Libya
at Marea', and a third at Elephantine."
(Gardiner p. 347) For Lehi, Egypt was not an option, neither was the
northern territories, or the Far East. Lehi was led out of the region
through the corridor to the south.
His destiny was in the Western Hemisphere. See: Pharaoh Necho II
and the Abraham Scroll,
p. 5 in Papers of the Fourteenth Annual Symposium on the Archaeology of
the
Scriptures, (UAS pp.226-278)"
THE JEWISH GARRISON AT ELEPHANTINE:
During the " Persian, Ptolemaic, and Roman periods (525-BD
to 70 AD) the century following the collapse of the mighty Assyrian Empire and
the fall of Nineveh
was a period of readjustment. At first it seemed that Babylon might regain its ancient dominance
through the rule of Nebuchadrezzar, but the abrupt emergence of a new force,
the Persians under Cyrus, shifted the center of power eastward. In 525 BC, Egypt fell like
an over-ripe fruit into the hands of the Persians under Cambyses; there is good
evidence that the conqueror had Egyptian collaborators. Egyptian tradition
insists that Cambyses was brutal and imperious. Since he was a conquering
invader, he himself may have been very rigorous, but his successors preferred
to cultivate Egypt
as a valued Persian satrapy. Darius l (522-486) BC [the main prophet at this
time was Zechariah] did his best to appear to the Egyptians as a legitimate
pharaoh. Tradition says that he was cordial to the native priests; certainly he
was responsible for the building of at least one new temple. Between the Nile
and the Gulf of Suez he completed the canal
which had been of interest to Pharaoh Neco; along its line in the Wadi Tumilat
he erected five steles inscribed in cuniform and hieroglyphic. Under his reign
we first hear of the Jewish colony at the First Cataract. Since this colony had existed before the time
of Cambyses, it probably had been founded as a frontier garrison in the
Twenty-sixth Dynasty [after 630 BC]. The
Saites had not only had Greek mercenaries; there had also been Asiatics,
including Jews." (Buttrick p. 55)
THE ISLAND
OF ELEPANTINE:
Elephantine is "Midway between Edfu and the narrows of Begel Silsila,
some fifty-five miles north of Aswan,
the [Egyptian] landscape changes completely.
Here one passes from the limestone country, which forms the bulk of Egypt into an inhospitable sandstone region
extending southwards for a thousand miles into the territory of the Sudan. Only a short stretch intervenes before the
First Cataract is reached just beyond the large island of Elephantine. The Cataract consists of rapids caused by the
intervention of great red [and] black granitic masses barring the way."
(Gardiner p. 31) One can look eastward over Elephantine and see the ridges of
sandstone reduced by erosion to yellow sand dunes, and near the river's edge,
the great monoliths of black granite from which the black obelisks of Egypt
were quarried and hauled down river to grace the tombs and monuments of many
Pharaohs. On the Island,
there are also quarries of the red granite. "Merenre who only reigned for a
short time, his half brother, Pipi II's
... ‘reign was the longest in Egyptian history' (Clayton p. 66) ....[he] reigned
down to nearly the end of the Old Kingdom about 2182 BC, [he] appointed Weni as
governor of the South. Weni was sent to Elephantine to "fetch the sarcophagus
and a precious pyramidion [the top
of the pyramid] for the king's [Merenre]
pyramid, while at Elephantine he secured doors
of red granite and other parts for the same monument." (Gardiner p. 94). Weni was a smart engineer, he quarried the
stone from the cataracts he "brought stone for the royal pyramid from the First
Cataract quarries, and in so doing cut five channels to facilitate passage
through the cataract." (Clayton p. 67).
THE EARLY DYNASTIES OF SCORPION AND NARMER:
The red and black
granite on Elephantine was extensively
quarried for monuments and obelisks.
The stone was preferred even during the early settlements in Egypt before
3500 BC. Wouldn't the area have been inhabited by the descendents of Adam down
until the time of the Flood? Since Adam
was the First Born man on this earth [Abraham 1:3] Would all of the Homo
Habilus forms [man like in habit] of pre-Adamic "men" have had a spirit body
born into the Celestial Family? Not likely. How would these man-like forms be
classified? As Animals? "To unravel the
processes of culture changes [of these man-like forms] ...evolving in the Lower
Paleolithic period (ca. 2 M to 100,000 BP) through the rise of the state
[Egyptian or elsewhere for that matter] under the first two dynasties [Scorpion
and Narmer] (ca 3100-2700 BP) is an
immense task." (Hoffman p. 8)
Early inhabitants of Egypt from 4000-3500 BC [apparently
descendants of Adam] were called irrigationists, these prehistoric
Egyptians
learned how to irrigate their fields. "And from that time on, life
began to
quicken in the valley. Irrigation seemed to start a chain reaction by
which one
civilizing force led to another." (Payne p. 27) After some eight
hundred years [from
4000 to 3200 BC] of progressive settlements, and the development of
three
kingdoms one at the Delta in Lower Egypt wearing the red crown, the
second near
present day Cairo, the Reed King with the White Crown, and the third in
Upper
Egypt at the First Cataract near Elephantine (Payne p. 30) the region
was ready
for unitization and civilization. About 3200 BC "Egyptian
civilization began with the
unification of the two lands, namely Upper and Lower Egypt, under one
king...the
Early Dynastic Period begins with Scorpion, [the first identified
Pharaoh] then
the more well known, Narmer, their precise dates are unknown. But they
were IN
PLACE about 3150 BC," (Clayton p. 16)
Wouldn't Adam still have been alive?
After the Flood the same red and black granite was quarried again for
the new occupants of the lands. Beyond the river bank are the many
ruins that
reflect that thoroughfare that once prevailed on this island. On the
upper
benches towering over the many ruins are recent sacred buildings more
recently
added to the occupants of this ancient frontier fortress. "This
provided Pharaonic Egypt with its natural frontier, though
ethnically as well as physically the Nubian land may well have begun
near
Silsila [seven miles south of Elephantine]."
(Gardiner p. 31) The Pharoah ‘Djoser', "succeeded Sanakhte to the
throne bout
2668 BC ...and extended his rule as far south as Aswan, the First
Cataract, later "the
official southern Boundary of Egypt."
(Clayton pp. 32-33) Djoser was
the one who built the first Step Pyramid. "This was the beginning of
the Old Kingdom (2686-2181...Dynasty 3)...The Pyramid Builders."
(Clayton pp. 30-31)
THE RAM-HEADED GOD CHNUM:
At Elephantine and on the highest
point of the isle of Sehel at Aswan, on a large rock there was a long
inscription which contains the name Djoser, "cut by the priests of the
god
Khnum of Elephantine, and lays claim to some 85 miles of territory
south of
Aswan known as the Dodekaschoinoi, ‘in the god's name', it having been
granted
by Djoser." (Clayton p. 33) This was in
an effort to "appease the Ram-headed God Khnum [or Chnum], the Nile
annual inundations were under his control." (Clayton
p. 73) Apparently the gift of land
appeased the God because a seven-year famine ended. Khnum was
worshipped at an early stage in Egypt and one of his temple sites
maintained for
many centuries was at Elephantine.
"Manetho's Egyptian History, gives
us the basic structure or skeleton of Egyptian chronology." (Clayton p. 9) But
"Manetho had curiously and doubtless inaccurately designated Elephantine
as Dynasty V's place of origin." (Gardiner p. 88) Elephantine
always continued to play an interesting political and religious role.
THE JEWISH GARRISON DEPARTS ELEPHANTINE:
To the south the Nubians were very dependent on their richer
civilized neighbor, and "not until much later did the thought of colonizing
Lower Nubia enter the Egyptian's minds; wisely they accepted Elephantine
as their southern frontier, realizing that the country beyond the First
Cataract was undesirable as a possession." (Gardiner p. 95)
The Jewish colony at Elephantine was established
approximately 630 BC a few decades before Lehi and his family left Jerusalem,
(Porten p 299) Review of the papyri
discovered on the island show no documents later than 399 BC. There are no definitive data to suggest where
the Jewish Colony survived very long beyond this period. There presence seems
to have disappeared soon after the establishment of the Ptolemaic Empire after
270 BC. (Gilbert p. 8)
The Elephantine Archives constitute a collection of Aramaic
documents dating back to the fifth century BC.
Aramaic is a language of the Middle East. "Arabic is ...the
principle language of the Near East today, and it can be shown to be
related to
earlier languages of the area including Aramaic..Hebrew and [the
earlier] Akkadian
(the language of the Assyrian empire), forming together the Semitic
Languages."
(Renfrew p. 13) None of these would have been related directly to the
language
used by the Jaredites. The earliest use of Aramaic usage in Palestine
dates to the ninth century BC ... "the use of Aramaic was [not]
confined to the
Jews, though that impression might be conveyed by the great and
sensational
finds of papyri written in that language discovered on the island of
Elephantine
just north of the First Cataract. It is
true that the persons whose concerns are there displayed in such
abundance and
variety were all or mainly Jews, but they were members of a frontier
garrison
and consequently in the service of the Persian regime. The most
convincing
evidence, however, that Aramaic was the medium in which the Persian
administration was carried on is afforded by a batch of letters mostly
addressed to his subordinates in Egypt by the satrap Arsames who was in
power
throughout the whole last quarter of the fifth century; these letters,
written
on leather, doubtless emanate from the satrap's chancery, probably at
Memphis."
(Gardiner p. 360)
Narmer (about 3150 BC) had "founded the city of Memphis, 20 miles south of the apex of the Delta, near
where the regions of Lower and Upper Egypt
meet, and established it as his capital. The city was destined to become the
greatest in the land. Narmer (Menes) and his immediate successors—some 18 kings
of two successive dynasties that spanned about 400 years- ruled from here."
(Casson p. 51) "It will have required
differences of race and religion ...[to] fan any unrest into flame. Such a case
arose on the island
of Elephantine in 410
BC. Here the worshippers of Yahu [Jehovah]
and the priests of the ram-headed god Chnum lived cheek by jowl. The native
priests took advantage of the absence abroad of the satrap Arsames to bribe the
local commandant Vidaranag, with the result that the [nearby] Jewish temple was
completely razed to the ground. Vidaranag was punished, but for a time the
temple remained unbuilt. The Aramaic papyri recounting this matter comprises a
petition sent to Bagoas, the Governor of Judah pleading for the rebuilding, and
it appears that this was ultimately conceded." (Gardiner pp. 361-362) The
temple was rebuilt. The Jewish Temple at Elephantine
will be discussed later in this series.
THE ARAMAIC ARCHIVES OF ELEPHANTINE LEFT BY THE JEWS:
"Originally, Aramaic scribes adopted the Phoenician alphabet
and scribal techniques, but over time a separate script emerged." (Crim p, 39)
Fitzmyer has classified Aramaic into five phases. (Fitzmyer 1:57-84).
Briefly, phase (1) is termed Old Aramaic and spans 925 BC to 700 BC. It was represented by writings on stone and
other materials. The oldest "archaic,
paleo-Hebrew inscription [was that found
on two tiny scrolls or plates of silver], the Ketef Hinnom Plates, one of the most significant
[Biblical] discoveries ever made" (Barkay, et al, p. 162-163) dating about 900
BC. Phase (2) Official Aramaic, from roughly 700 BC to 200 BC, - was written on
papyri and animal skins. The term
Official is used because of the vast geographical areas; which spoke the
language (Egypt, Palestine, Assyria, Afghanistan, and Pakistan). The Elephantine texts
are representative of this second phase.
Middle Aramaic, from 200 B.C. to AD 200 is Phase (3) which also
encompasses the Dead Sea Scroll Conventors from Qumran.
An important historical note is that the Savior spoke Aramaic from this time
period. Phase (4) is late Aramaic
spanning AD 200 to 700 . Finally Modern
Aramaic, Phase (5), is still spoken in various areas of northern Syria, Iran,
Iraq,
and related regions.
The Elephantine archives were written on papyri (writing
material similar to paper derived from the pith of the papyrus plant when
pressed.) and on leather as noted, and are represented by three Aramaic
document collections [see BOOK OF MORMON NAMES in this series]. It was the third collection, which contained
the lists of names of interest in this
study. "This is one of the most significant
finds of Aramaic records in history." (Porten p. vii) And that is in part true
as applied to the Book of Mormon.
THE RECOVERY OF THE ELEPANTINE ARCHIVES:
The late 1800's found the Middle East
relatively unchanged over the past few millennia. In 1893, sometime between January 28 and
February 12, Charles Edwin Wilbur purchased a number of papyri including nine
complete documents and numerous fragments. Wilbur was an Egyptologist, but
unfamiliar with Aramaic. This is
supported by an envelope containing some Elephantine fragments and a note by
him questioning whether or not the writing was Phoenician. He placed the papyri in tin biscuit boxes and
added them to a trunk containing some other Egyptian writings. They remained hidden to the world for over
fifty years until 1947 when the Egyptian Department of the Brooklyn Museum
received the trunk from the estate of Miss Theodora Wilbur: Charles Wilbur's
daughter. This treasure was subsequently
published in 1953 as The Brooklyn Museum
Aramaic Papyri and represents the single largest collection of Aramaic
documents in the Western world. (Kraeling :3).
An earlier major related discovery was made by Archibald
Henry Sayce, a prominent Oxford Orientalist. He obtained "the first
body of
material, composed of legal texts...acquired from dealers". (Buttrick
p. 83) Some
of which was published in 1903. Late in
1870 he obtained a complete scroll from diggers on the Island of
Elephantine
which was "published by Archibald H. Sayce and Sir Arthur Ernest Cowley
in
1906." (Buttrick p. 83). "The second and most important lot was
recovered by
excavation carried on by the Berlin Museum and was published
by Eduard Sachau in 1911." (Buttrich p. 83)
A papyrus had been published by Julius Euting early in 1903, the
Strassbury Papyrus, but was not recognized as having been derived from
Elephantine at the time of publication. In 1904 Lady William
Cecil and Sir Robert
Mond purchased three and five rolls of papyri respectively and donated
them to
the Cairo Museum.
These documents were published two years later by Sayce and Cowley in
1906. The Elephantine Archives did not begin to really receive the
attention
they deserved until their publication by Porten.
GOURNAH-THE TOMB WHERE THE MUMMIES AND SCROLLS CAME FROM:
Until 1904, the French-initially under the direction of
Gaston Maspero-had been excavating the actual site of Elephantine
without much success. This is the same Maspero who had some success in
finding
tombs and secondary internment sites of Pharaohs, including the famous
tomb
repository near El-Gournah (Cotrell, pp.
147-149) famous for the tomb area where the mummies came from, which
Joseph
Smith ended up with. (Todd p. 7) The German Scholar Rubensohn persuaded
the Berlin Museum
to approach Maspero for permission to excavate. . In 1907 Edward
Sachau presented to the Prussian Academy three of these recovered
texts. The significance of these texts [especially
for the Book of Mormon] was substantial since they discussed the Jewish
Temple
built at Elephantine (See Porten).
The Jews at Elephantine were mercenaries hired by Egypt for the protection of the southern Nile in
Upper [elevation wise] Egypt.
If one examined the Old Testament during the time period of the establishment
of the Elephantine Jewish Colony after 630 BC it is clear that the Middle East was in turmoil. In Nephi 1:4 we learn..."and in
that same year came many prophets, prophesying unto the people that they must
repent, or the great city of Jerusalem
must be destroyed." Lehi was one of those prophets. The Book of Mormon claims that, "when the
Jews heard these things they were angry with him; yea, even as with the
prophets of old, who they had cast out, and stoned, and slain; and they also
sought his, life that they might take it
away." (I Nephi l:20).
In the face of mortal jeopardy, Lehi must have reflected on
where he might safely take his family. But he was told in a dream that he would
be guided by the Lord away from Jerusalem (see
l: Nephi 3:l) One might ask: why not go
to Egypt? Porten describes an instance where a
contemporary prophet did just that.
"Jehoiakim, a prophet of Kiriath-Jearim, Uriah b. Shemiah, arose and,
like Jeremiah, prophesied against Jerusalem and Judah. Sought by the King, he fled to Egypt when he
was extradited and sentenced to death." (Porten:13) Thus, Egypt would not have been
safe. This episode is a confirmation of
Nephi's statement regarding the intolerance of prophecies against Jerusalem. It also correctly sets the regional
environment that would require Lehi to take his family to a "Promised Land",
unknown to the Old World.
The significance of these Aramaic documents to students of
the Book of Mormon lie in their contemporary time setting to Lehi and his
family. Both groups date to nearly the
same time period around the reign of Zedekiah.
There will be a number of areas
examined in this series of studies.
Extensive name parallels will be discussed along with some other
interesting and important similarities between the two cultures.
RECENT WORK AT ELEPHANTINE:
In "399 [BC] Shewa b. Zechariah [a Jewish exile] wrote to
Islah, [in Jerusalem] perhaps from Memphis, and reported the
seizure of the throne by Nepherites." (Porten p. 296)
There then followed three more Egyptian Dynasties down to
343 BC. "Before Artaxerxes III had reconquered Egypt
in 343, the "last Pharaoh, Necanebos II,
the last Egyptian to rule Egypt
for the next 2300 years". (Clayton p. 205) had commenced construction on the
southern edge of the island [of Elephantine] a
temple to Khnum....and one to Sati...they were further enlarged under the Ptolemies
and the Romans." (Porten p. 296). "The
work on the Khnum temple was consummated
by Alexander II. The free-standing portal which he erected may still be seen
there today." (Porten p. 297) Greek records are found in the excavations after
that. It would seem that the Jews had
left, perhaps going to Nubia
or Alexandria in Egypt. Excavations of both the Knum
and Satet temples were undertaken in 1938 [and continued intermittently to
1958]. "the street which skirts the [last] wall [of construction] of the Khnum
temple seems to impinge on the houses of the Aramean district in a manner
suggesting that these [formally occupied by the Jews] were no longer occupied
when it was laid." (Porten p. 297) After
270 BC only the spirits of the Dead occupied Elephantine.
But, now through the recovery of its records it lives again.
"Excavations continue at Elephantine."
(Cottrell, p. 226)
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Barkay, Gabriel,
et al. The Challenges of Ketef Hinnom,
[the Ketef Hinnom inscriptions are...the earliest known artifacts from the
ancient world that document passages from the Hebrew Bible, Near Eastern
Archaeology, Vol. 66 No. 4, December 2003
Buttrick, George
A., The Interpreters's Dictionary of the
bible, Abingdon Press, New York 1962
Casson, Lionel, Ancient Egypt,
Time Incorporated, New York,
1965
Cottrell,
Leonard, The Lost Pharaohs, The
Universal Library, Grosset & Dunlap, New York, 1961
Clark, James R., The Story of the Pearl of Great Price, Bookcraft,
Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah 1955
Clayton, Peter
A., Chronicle of the Pharaohs, Thames
and Hudson, London, 1994
Christensen, Ross
T., Archaeology and the Pearl of Great
Price, A study of the Lebolo-Chandler Collection of Egyptian Antiquities, in
Pearl of Great Price Conference, BYU,
Provo, Utah, 1960
Fitzmyer, Joseph
A., A Wandering Aramean Collected Aramaic
Essays, Ann Arbor, Edwards Brother, Inc., 1979
FARMS, INSIGHTS
VOL. 24, 2004, PP. 4-5
Gardiner, Sir
Alan, The Egyptians, Folio Society, London 1961
Gee, John, A Guide to The Joseph Smith Papyri, FARMS, BYU, Provo, Utah,
2000
Gilbert,
Martin, Jewish History Atlas, Macmillan Publishing Co., New York, 1969
Hoffman, Michael
A., Egypt before the Pharaohs, Alfred A. Knoph, New York 1979
Hunter, Milton
R., Pearl of Great Price Commentary, Desert
Book, Salt Lake City, Utah, 1945
Hunter contends that Adam spent 70 years in the Garden of Eden, died
930.
Kraeling, Emil
G., The Brooklyn
Museum Aramaic Papyri, Yale University
Press, New Haven,
1953
Oren, Elizer D.,
Editor, The Hyksos: New Historical and
Archaeological Perspectives, The University
Museum, University
of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 1997
Payne, Elizabeth, The
Pharaohs of Ancient Egypt, Random
House, New York,
1964
Porten, Bezalel, Archives from Elephantine, University of Calif.
Press, Berkeley
1968
Nibley, Hugh, 3, Ancient Documents and the Pearl of Great
Price, BYU Home Study Guide, 1990 (sic) Provo, Utah
---------- 2, Since
Cumorah, Deseret Book Co., Salt
Lake City, Utah 1967
Noerdlinger,
Henry S., Moses and Egypt, University
of Southern California Press, Los Angeles, 1956
Redford, Donal
B., Textual Sources for the Hyksos
Period, in The Hyksos: New Historical
Archaeological Perspectives, Edited by Elizer D. Oren, The University
Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 1997
Shanks, Hershel,
Ed, Debate, Biblical Archaeology
Review, Jan-Feb 2005 Vol. 31, 1 Sweeny,
Marvin A. Zephaniah: Prophet of His
Time-Not the End Time! In Bible Review, Vol. XX, No. 6, Dec. 2004
Todd, Jay M.,
In: A
Brief History of the Lebolo Papyri and Mummies, Book of Abraham Symposium, Salt
Lake Institute of Religion, University of Utah, 1970
UAS, Newletter, No. 95, BYU May 22, 1955
|