THE ANCIENT
CITY
OF NAGAR
In the Near East, in the upper part of Mesopotamia near the
Syrian and Turkish border, is Tell Brak; now known as the Ancient City of Nagar
an ancient capital of a State
Kingdom. It is a huge
mound made up of the remains of centuries of cities overbuilt one atop each
other and more than 250 acres in extent. The ancient city is located on the Zweligua River overlooking an important River
Crossing. The mound is so strewn with ceramic shards one cannot walk without
stepping on broken pottery. There is a photo of the mound showing the vast
areas of broken pottery on page xxxi of Oates. Artifacts and material from the Halaf and Ubaid
prehistoric (5000-4200 BC) periods, (Arnold
p. 18) indicate a long history reaching back into the Neolithic times near
9,000 BC. But the city rose abruptly in size and importance soon after the
beginning of the Adamic Period 4000 BC, or Terminal Ubaid, about 4000 BC, then was
replaced by Early Northern Uruk, about 4000-3500 BC. (Oates p. xxx) These people would have been descendents of
Adam.
The city of Nagar
was in place and flourishing some 3600 BC. (Yoffe p. 43) "The site is best known for its sequence of
rich temples of the late Uruk and Jamdet Nasr periods, when it was clearly an
important centre. Most famous of all is the so called Eye
Temple, richly decorated with clay
cones, copper panels, and gold work, in a style very similar to that found in
the contemporary temples of Sumer
[way to the south] in southern Mesopotamia." (Whitehouse
p. 71) In fact it is directly related in
style to Uruk the First Great City
of Mesopotamia, (Liverani; Akkermans p. 181) whose influence had a tremendous
spread in ancient Mesopotamia. Uruk was located on the north end of
the Persian Gulf. It was the First City of
Mesopotamia. (Liverani p. 1) It will be the subject of a future study. After
the flood, some 2600 BC, the ancient sites and new cities would have been
occupied by descendents of Noah.
MEANING OF THE
NAME NAGAR
The name Nagar means ‘a cultivated place' or, possibly, a
‘spring'. In Biblical Hebrew the West
Semitic root, ‘ngr', has the meaning ‘to gush forth'. (Oates p. 380) Modern Archaeologists' suggest that the period of
written documents did not begin until about 3500 BC. However the LDS believe Adam
kept records. (Moses 6:5) Enoch kept a record and also recorded it on stone. (D&C
107:57) Abraham refers to multiple records going back to the beginning that he
had access to. (Abraham1:28) Recent discoveries confirm this tradition of
records from the beginning. From the Revelation
of Adam found in Egypt nearly half a century ago we get: "Adam imparted his
revelations to his son Seth, and showed him his original greatness before the
Transgression and his going out of Paradise...Seth welcomed the teaching of his
father...it was given to him to inscribe
this wisdom in a book and to teach
it...for the first time in this world there were seen a book written in the name of the Most High. Seth bequeathed to his
descendants the book thus written,
and that book was handed down even
to Noah...In the time of the Flood, Noah took with him into the ark the Books [now plural] of these teachings,
and when he came out of the ark, he ordained in his turn that the generations
that came after him were to repeat the many things and the holy mysteries
written in the books of Seth upon
the Majesty of the Father and upon all the mysteries [ordinances]. Hence these books, these mysteries and this
narrative were handed down even to
our fathers, who welcomed them with joy and passed them on to us." (Doresse
p.185) The restoration documents and the
Book of Mormon are correct histories finding abundant confirmation in recent
discoveries.
At the time of early Nagar more regional centers were also developing.
One thousand years later, about 2400 BC,
the earlier history of Nagar is "illuminated by much information found in the
pre-Sargonic archives from Tell Mardikh (Ebla), Tell Hariri, (Mari) and Tell
Beydar (ancient Nabada/Nabatium, Erickson 22 Feb 2006) ...In these sources Nagar appears as a capital of one of the most powerful kingdoms in northern
Syria...located in the Khabur Region." (Eidem p. 99 in Oates 2001) But a major
archive of documents has not yet been found at Nagar, but it is only a matter
of time until such happens. Cities of
this size have always yielded major documents.
This study therefore, is limited to the sparse site materials and
tablets so far found and especially bulla such as the: "Two dedicatory inscriptions
of the Old Akkadian king Rimush (c. 2278-2270) found by an earlier excavator, Mallowan,
one of which came from the debris of the Naram-Sin Palace." (Eidem p. 99 in
Oates 2001) The most ancient reference
to Nagar probably comes from [the ancient Kingdom of] Mari. (Eidem p. 99 in
Oates 2001) "The many inscriptions,
scattered in various trenches, surely indicate that major archives from the
late third millennium are likely to appear in on-going excavations at the
site." (Eidem pp. 103-105) The present and recent wars in the Near
East prohibit on-going excavations.
NAGAR, EBLA AND KISH
The abundant Ebla
texts involving Nagar "document the earliest diplomatic marriages attested
anywhere in the cuniform record...two royal marriages of wider political significance,
first with Nagar, the second with
the even more powerful king of Kish
in southern Sumeria near modern Bhagdad.
The marriage alliance with Nagar was under...Is ar-Adum, the last king of
Ebla...the crown prince of Nagar, Ultum-huhu, marrying Tagris-Damu, a princess of
Ebla...whereas the superior status of
the son of the King of Kish is
reflected in his marriage to the princess Hirdut, daughter of the then
queen." (Oates p. 381) The nearly 40,000 tablets of Ebla yielding name lists provide a great deal of names of Kingdoms
and cities in contact with Ebla and those with which Ebla had a more intimate
relationship, or marriage ties, including Nabada
and Nagar. (Pettinato pp.
188-190) Ebla
documents list large numbers of special garments and textiles, jewelry and
sumptuous garments, which the bride took to Nagar for the ceremonies where she was to become Queen. (Oates p.
381) Various hoards of gold, silver, and
copper/bronze objects were also recovered during excavations of Nagar. (McDonald pp. 227, 233-256, in
Oates 2001) The reference to the King of Kish is
extremely important because that name
is found in the Book of Mormon in the direct genealogical listing descendants for Jared. Kish
is the 30th descendant of Jared. This is a direct link of the Book of Ether in
the Book of Mormon and the records of ancient Nagar. Because of the prominence of the name Kish, it appears in nearly
all tablets recovered from most of the ancient cities of the Near
East, and since the Jaredites records are authentic, it is expected
to be found there.
There was a major battle fought at Nagar with destruction
over the whole of the site, marking the initial Akkadian appearance in the Khabur.
Nagar was rebuilt and was the seat of the Kingdom of the Akkadians for
four generations. It had a long history, down to Roman times ending with the
construction of a Roman Castellium about 350 AD. (Oates p. xxx)
LOCATION OF NAGAR
Several major trails and trade routes led from the Tigris Valley
northwesterly to southeastern Anatolia and to western Syria. One of
these roads left the Tigris at the great city of Assur (Ashur), the capitol of Assyria
in it's hey day. It continued northwesterly through the gap or pass at the
western end of Jebel (Mount) Sinjar, between it and Jebel Jeribe, then it
continued on the northern flanks of Jebel Jeribe northward to Lake Khatuniye,
then more directly north-northwest to the confluence of the Wadis Radd and
Jaghjagh. Many large cities line the banks of the Jaghjagh. There a major river crossing was once controlled
by a large city on the north bank, now the immense mound of Tell Brak, the
ancient city of Nagar.
(Oates pp. xxv-xxvii) Near the end of the Third Millennium BC it was the
largest of the cities of the Subartu
Region, and politically the most important. The city functioned as a Gateway City to the rich agricultural lands of
the Khabur plains, a major station on the roads to the north through the Mardin
Gap, visible from the city, and onwards to Diyarbakr and the rich copper mines
of Ergani. (Oates p. xxv) It had its
beginnings in the early Fourth Millennium BC, with a Neolithic history before
that, and then rose to its heights during the last third of the Third
Millennium, but as even larger cities were established elsewhere in the region Nagar
declined through the subsequent centuries.
EXCAVATIONS AT NAGAR
Archaeologists were busy in the Khabur Plains before 1930
when Mallowan began his pioneering excavations at Nagar. Max von Oppenheim had
been excavating before that at Tell Halaf to the northwest of Nagar and no
doubt had walked over the mound of Nagar and saw its potential. David Oates and Sid Kasem Tuweir had been
working at Tell al Rimah in northern Iraq, and other sites in the region,
focusing on second millennium sites, they turned their interest to third
millennium sites, and owing to Mallowans's excavations of the Naram-sin
‘Palace' at Tell Brak they included that mound in their survey for a likely place to dig in 1975. "Brak stood out as ideal for the
investigation of this period...the southern area of the mound appeared to have
been abandoned at the end of the third millennium, a situation which promised
relatively simple access to levels of this date." (Oates p. xxv) "Brak [Nagar] lay
approximately at the modern limits of rain fed farming, allowing at least the
possibility of investigating the impact of marginal climatic variation on the
history of the area at this time." (Oates p. xxv) They wanted to understand the "urban growth in
this region in the third millennium and, very specifically, to investigate the credibility
of Akkadian imperial claims. [of that time period]." (Oates p. xxv) They began their work in 1975 and continued
through to 1999, and when the region is stable again, they may resume work
there. A summary of their findings is on the Chart included herewith. (Oates p.
xxx) Little work has been done on that
portion of the Mound with Fourth Millennium occupation, a substantial
settlement with monumental walls. Large
portions of the site are still intact.
Thus, this is a preliminary study of Nagar, it is only PART 1.
NAGAR AS A
PROVINCIAL CAPITAL AND MAJOR POWER
With the 1976 discovery of tablets at Ebla, extensive information on the entire
region was obtained. "Changing power-relations between the major Khabur
kingdoms had made Nagar preeminent
in the period covered by the Ebla Texts."
(Oates p. 101) "Later, in the 3rd millennium BC, Tell Brak became a provincial
capital of the Akkadian empire; the palace
of Naram Sin, grandson of
Sargon, during this period was more of a depot for storage of tribute and loot
than residential seat. The city was plundered after the fall of the Akkadian
empire, but the palace was rebuilt in the Ur III period by Ur Nammu."
(Whitehouse p. 71) Sargon l (2334-2279
BC) was the King of Akkad, Naram-sin (2254-2218 BC) was his grandson, who made
some great conquests including Ebla,
built a great palace at Nagar. His son Shar-Kali-Sharri (2217-2194), was the
last of the dynasty. Enmenana, a
daughter of Naram Sin, was High Priestess at Ur
[near the city of Uruk on the Persian
Gulf]. (Roaf p. 96) The family of Abraham, whose records were in
the Brass Plates, may have also transmitted names down in the records, later
used by the Nephites. Nagar was only
about 100 miles slightly south east of Harran where Abraham lived for a while
before departing for Canaan under the Lord's
direction. Naram-Sin was so "state-conscious [that he] chose Tell Brak [Nagar] as
the focus of his administration in the Khabur region, (Oates p. 379) attested to
by the presence of the palace bearing his name.
"Linguistically, mid-third-millennium Nagar is part of a
wider landscape of Semitic-speaking kingdoms." (Oates p. 3780) Most of the cities employed Sumerian cuniform to write their documents. "The Sumerian King List gives
Semitic names for most of the rulers of the first dynasty of Kish
[one of the earliest empires]. By 2600-2500 BC, tablets from Abu Salibikh [The
subject of a future entry], near Nippur in
central Sumer,
bear a large number of Semitic names, including the names of half the scribes
who wrote on the tablets found in Sumerian.
There is no evidence from the century before Sargon (2371-2316 BC) for
anything in the nature of a Semitic ‘invasion'. And such Semites as did arrive
during that [early time] probably came in as individual families, [from the
north] settling in the northern Sumerian settlements and cities and rapidly
adopting Sumerian Culture and loyalty to their adoptive city-state." (Saggs pp.
41-42)
Nagar became the head city of a major state before 2400 BC
and traded effectively and independently with the great centers of about that
time as far away as India; Ebla to the southwest
and Mari to the southeast. The second city of this State, was Nabada, 50 miles west on the banks of
the Wadi Aweidj. (Sallaberger & Ur
p. 610, Erickson 22 Feb 2006)
PERSONAL
NAMES
The following names include geographic and personal names available
as of 2001. Of particular interest are names related to those
found in the Book of Ether in the Book of Mormon, directly related to the
Jaredites. The prefixes or suffixes being studied are identified
and then Book of Mormon names with those same elements, prefixes or suffixes are then listed so one can
make immediate comparison. Then the prefixes
or suffixes are discussed and their
meanings given when they are available. Earlier studies in this series are
referred to if findings in other archives in other cities have also been found
to shed light on Book of Mormon names. The main objective is to shed additional
light on the prefixes and suffixes and other names in the Book of
Mormon, comparing them with the names appearing in the ancient documents. This study is intended to be preliminary in
character, not exhaustive, because other documents in process if being
translated will shed additional light on much of what follows in the future.
PREFIXS OR NAMES
‘Aha', ‘Ahu' or "Ahah': AHA,
AHAH, AHAZ
The Book of Mormon name Aha
is found in Alma 16:5, one of two sons of Zoram, the name could have been
derived from the Jaredite records because the name Ahah is found in Ether 1:9 where it is noted that Ethem is the son
of Ahah the 40th
descendent of Jared. (Largey p. 431) The
Jaredites passing through this region of northern Mesopotamia on their Journey
to the Americas
would have been familiar with names in use at that time. This is one of the reasons some of this name
search is directed at the oldest sites in the Subartu region to see if names found there appear in the Book of
Mormon, particularly the Jaredite records. And the names do occur, as expected.
This is positive confirmation of the Jaredite record as a genuine genealogy of
correct names from that time period. How
could Joseph Smith make the time distinctions so accurately and with so many
names? Certainly the information and
translation data was not available to him, in some instances the information on
names was not available until 2006.
The name Ahaz,
the eleventh King of Judah, is a common name and a well known king's name in
the Tanakh. (2 Kings 15:38) There it has the Hebrew meaning of
‘possessor'. In l Kings 22:40, the name Ahaziah, meaning ‘God holds firm' is
the son of Ahab and Jezebel. (Mandel p. 37)
It is a Biblical name and no doubt would have been in the Brass Plates.
At Nagar these prefixes
show up in a sealed bulla with the names a-hu-ahu,
or Ahu-ahi, meaning ‘brother's brother', the name of a Nagar scribe, having these prefix
elements very much like three of the
listed Book of Mormon names. (Eidem p. 106, in Oates 2001) Nagar documents have
the name ahudu. The vowels ‘a' and ‘u' are interchangeable. (Ibed p. 119) Thus, Aha
and Ahu are the same. The name Aha
is common in the Neo-Assyrian name lists. It is West Semitic and means
‘brother'. (Radner p. 56) The gender
form for a female is ‘Ahata', adding
to the prefix Aha the suffix of ‘ta'. Ahata
means ‘sister'. (Radner p. 58) By adding
to the prefix ‘Aha' the suffix of ‘ti'
(Ahati) the meaning is ‘my
sister', and if the suffix is ‘tu' (Ahatu) it means ‘his sister'. (Radner p. 59) In the Neo-Assyrian name lists there are more
than 320 names with these prefixes.
(Radner pp. 56-89) It would have been a
serious omission if the Book of Mormon did not have at least one name with
these prefixes. It is nice to find
that there are several such names, and that they are linked with the Jaredite
genealogy. These prefixes have been
discussed in a number of previous web site entries, including (Erickson 17 Aug
2005; 22 Feb 2006) Refer to those entries for additional detailed discussions.
THE PREFIXES ‘Ab' and ‘Abi': ABEL,
ABINADI, ABINADOM, ABISH, ABLOM, ABRAHAM
The prefixes ‘ab'
and ‘abi' are found in many of the
available name lists of the Near East. These prefixes have been discussed in a
number of other web site entries as mentioned above. At Nagar in a list of
animals probably belonging to individuals is the name Abikum with the Abi prefix. (Eidem p. 10, in Oates 2001)
There is also the name ‘Abu'. (Ibed
p. 110) The ending of ‘i' or ‘u' doesn't change the name. They all
mean the same ‘father'. (Radner p. 1) In
the Tanakh, the name ‘Abi' (daughter
of Zechariah, 2 Kings 18:2) means ‘my father', Abel (son of Adam) means ‘the father is Elohim' or
‘emptiness', Abinadab (keeper of the ark (l Samuel 7:1) meaning ‘father of
generosity', Abish, Abishi or Abishai (a leading commander in David's army, l Samuel 26:6) means
‘father of gift'. (Mandel pp. 3-13) The prefix Abdi means ‘my servant'. (Mandel pp. 3-13). Abish
is also the name of Lamanitish women. (Alma
19:16) Additional information on this prefix
can be found in earlier entries to this site. (Erickson 17 Aug 2005; 22 Feb
2006) Again, there are many names in
most of the ancient archives recovered with this prefix. Its inclusion in the Book of Mormon would be expected.
THE PREFIX ‘Amu': AMULEK, AMULON, AMULONITES
This prefix is
found at Nagar in the name amur-dinger,
the suffix -dinger, identifies the
named person as a leader, so the actual
name is just Amur. (Eidem p. 119, in
Oates 2001) There are no names in the
Tanakh with this prefix. In the Neo-Assyrian
name lists, there are a variety of names with the prefix, Amudani, amukanu, amukanu, amukkaani, all West Semitic,
where it seems the prefix Amu- means ‘pillar'. (Baker p. 107) There are more than fifteen names with the prefix Amu- in the Neo-Assyrian
name lists. (Radner pp. 109-111) Most of
them are of Akkadian origin, the time period of Nagar covered by the
inscriptions found, others are West Semitic. In some instances the prefix ‘Amu' refers to the Egyptian God Amon. (Radner p. 109) And in the
name Amu-rtese, meaning ‘It is Amon who has given him', Amu-rteesi,
[or Amu-rtese] sells his daughter in marriage to an Egyptian women. (Radner p.
109)
THE PREFIX ‘ha': HAGOTH, HAMATH
The names ha-ab-a-za,
and ha-bi-ra-am- are found on bullas
at Nagar. (Eidem p. 119, in Oates 2001)
The element ‘H' is the
abbreviation of an unknown deity, or abbreviation of a divine name such as HDD,
as in the storm God ‘Haddad', and is attested to in Egyptian graffito from
Abydos, and an inscription from Carthage, which is Phoenician in origin. (Benz
p. 302) The diety names Haddu, Hadu,
Hadda, Hada, Hedda, Handa, Handu, are all found in the Neo-Syrian lists. The
name Hamum, meaning ‘father in law' is also in those lists. (Gelb p. 19) With
the possibilities of a Phoenician connection to the reformed Egyptian of the
Book of Mormon, the Abydos and Carthage parallel might be expected.
(Erickson 29 Jan 2005) The elements ‘HM' or the prefix hama
or ham, in the Biblical name Hamath
(2 Nephi20:9) are found in Neo-Assyrian names such as Hamasum, Hamrum, and Hamsatum. (Gelb p. 20) The ‘tum'
ending, or suffix, when used generally is feminine.
THE PREFIX ‘ir': IRREANTUM
‘Ir' is found in
the names ir-dan-i and ir-ra-GAR, and ir-zu-ni, at Nagar. (Eidem
p. 19, in Oates p. 119) This prefix
has been discussed in various earlier studies including: Erickson 22 Feb 2006;
15 April 2005, and so won't be repeated here.
The fact that many diverse cities have documents that confirm Book of
Mormon usages and names, and by virtue of the very repetition of names, and prefixes, suffixes, cores, and
abbreviations prove most conclusively the unique character and authenticity of
the Book of Mormon names. There are more
than 100 names in the Ebla Lists with the ‘Ir'
prefix, and one name Irrara having
the double ‘rr' such as found in Irreantum. These are the kind of things
that could have tripped Joseph Smith up, because in the Book of Mormon the
meaning of the name was also given, meaning ‘many waters'. (l Ne. 17:5) The ‘tum'
ending, or suffix, is a gender
designation; waters would have been feminine. (Sallaberger pp. 43-49)
THE KINGDOM
OF KISH
As noted above, the prince of Nagar is married for
diplomatic purposes with the daughter of the King of Kish.
Kish
is an old city near Babylon, it lies near the
area where the tower
of Babel was built. (See various
maps for this web site) From this general area, most likely, the Jaredites were
led away to the Americas.
(Erickson 4 Aug 2005) Documents from
Nagar refer to Kish,
and documents recovered from Ebla and Mari refers
to Kish.
As noted above and elsewhere, Kish is the 30th
descendant of Jared. So the link of the ancient cities with the Jaredites
occurs again and again throughout the various archives and documents, providing
a very distinctive and positive link to the Jaredites.
THE PREFIX ‘ku': KUMEN, KUMENONHI, KISHKUMEN
Bulla, pillow shaped tablets, flat on one side, from Nagar
contain the names of ku-un-sa-lim
and ku-ru-ub-en-zu. (Ibed p. 119) In the Book of Mormon, the consonant elements of ‘KM' in ‘kum' are prefixes to
names such as kumrum and kumsum, with the meaning of ‘priest'.
(Gelb p. 23) Kumen and Kumenonhi are both among the apostolic
twelve established by Christ in the western Hemisphere. (3 Ne. 19:4) But Kishkumen, was just the opposite, being
a murderer (Hel. l:11) However, the prefix
Kish
would appear to have been derived from the gold plates Mosiah had translated of
the Jaredites. Kish,
a descendant of Jared, has been discussed elsewhere, as has the prefix ‘ku'. There are fifteen names in the Amorite name lists with the prefix ‘Ku'. (Gelb p. 23)
At the time of Nagar, the Ebla name lists have an abundance of names
with the prefix ‘ku', where the meaning is ‘true'. There
are more than thirty names in the Ebla
lists with this prefix. (Pagan pp.
343-344) One name has the ‘kum' prefix in the name Kumi. These names have been discussed elsewhere. (Erickson 22 Feb
2006; April 2006)
THE PREFIX ‘is':
ISAAC, ISABEL, ISAIAH, ISHMAEL, ISHMAELITE, ISRAEL, ISRAELITE
This prefix is
found in the above six names that occur in the Book of Mormon, but they are all
Biblical names, some of them reflect the time of Abraham and his family. No
Nephite or Jaredite names have this prefix, though it and all of the names
above no doubt are to be found in the Brass Plates. The prefix
‘is' or ‘isa', found in three of the names given above, means ‘city' and is
found in such names as Isi, Isanitu, Isanaiu, Isau, which are
old Akkadian names, though they are also found in Neo-Assyrian lists as well,
(Baker p. 565) which again, places these kinds of names and prefixes in the time of early Nagar.
Thus, we find in the contemporary Ebla
name lists, that there are nearly four pages of names with the ‘Is' prefix. (Pagan pp. 339-342) and several with the ‘Isa' such as isabu, isane, isaldaum, isalli, and isalmalik
(Malik sought), (Pagan p. 339), with varied meanings of ‘man', ‘sought', and
‘asked'.
THE PREFIX ‘lam' : LAMAN,
LAMANITES, LAMONI
The name lamu...is
found on a Bulla at Nagar. (Ibed p. 119) This prefix,
‘lam' has been discussed in several
of these studies (Erickson 17 Aug 2005) The consonants ‘LM' are found in many Semitic documents from a number of cities.
The name Lama is found in the
ancient archives of Ebla
with the meaning ‘why'. (Pagan p. 24) With
the hypocoristic endings, or abbreviations for God endings, ‘n', ‘on', ‘an', ‘oah', ‘ahah', or ‘ah' the
meaning is ‘why God?', appropriate for Laman and Lemuel. Lamoni was a descendant of Ishmael (Alma 17:21), and for a
time as king of the Lamanites, he had the same attitude, but Ammon finally
converted him.
THE PREFIX
‘lib': LIB
This name is an exact match to a name found at Nagar. The
name Lib, found in the Book of
Mormon, (Ether l:17) is a Jaredite name. He was the 31st descendent
of Jared. Therefore it is an ancient name, and to find it in the old Nagar name
lists sheds light on the Jaredite contacts as they left the vicinity of the tower of Babel
near Babylon and Kish.
The name on a bulla (No. 33, I 6) from Nagar is li-bur-be-li. (Eidem p. 119, in Oates 2001) This name has also been
discussed in other studies.
THE PREFIX ‘mu':
MULEK, MULOKI
Found in the name mu-ri-is,
or Muris, on a Bulla (No. 12) at Nagar, the prefix may have been utilized by the Mulekites and have been in
circulation in Jewish records about the time Mulek departed Jerusalem
as it was being destroyed. The names would have come into the records of the
Nephites after the discovery of the Mulekites and the records of Zarahemla who
was a descendant of Mulek. (Mosiah
25:2) Muloki worked with Ammah, (Alma 20:2) he also preached with Aaron,
and even preached alone. (Alma
21:11) There are more than 60 names in the Ebla lists with the prefix ‘mu', two of them have the prefix ‘mul', often the meaning is ‘knowing, ecstatic, or foal'. (Pagan pp.
351-353) The prefix may have been in the brass plates where there is listed a Muppim, which means ‘wavings', one of
the ten sons of Benjamin. (Gen.
46:21) But the bible also had that name
as well as that of Mushi, meaning ‘sensitive',
grandson of Levi. (Exodus 6:19) Since
the Mulekites had no contact with the Brass Plates, mostly likely the use of
the name and the prefix has Biblical
Hebrew as its origin. (Mandel p. 390)
THE PREFIX
‘rab': RABBONAH
The name Rabbonah,
with the prefix ‘rab' was singled out for explanation in Alma 18:13 as meaning
"great', mighty', and has been discussed elsewhere. It is found in the name Ra-bi-il on a Bulla from
Nagar. (Eidem p. 119, in Oates 2001) In
the name Rabbum, the meaning is
‘numerous', (Gelb p. 29) a take off on ‘great'.
In names found in the Tanakh, the meaning of Rab or Rabb includes
‘chief'. (Mandel p. 431) In the Ebla name list the name Rabbatum means ‘great', (Pagan p. 345) confirming
the special explanation given for that name in the Book of Mormon. (Alma 18:13) Other studies
in this series have discussed this prefix.
THE PREFIX ‘LU':
LURAM
Luram was one of
those who died by the sword in the great final battle at Cumorah, or the Hill
Shim. (Moroni
9:2) The name may have been taken from the Plates of Ether, or from the Brass
Plates. It goes back into some antiquity as the documents from Nagar indicate.
From Nagar we get the name Lu-ri-im,
(Eidem page 129 in Oates 2001) which is very close to the Book of Mormon name, both
names have the consonants ‘LRM'. Both
names end with ‘m', attesting to the
ancient practice of mimation.
(Nibley p. 288) The longer prefix ‘Lura' is found in one name, and the prefix Lur, is found in two other names in the Amorite name lists, Lurabi, Lurieu and Lurihu, again
testifying to their antiquity. (Gelb p. 619) In the Ebla
name lists for towns and villages the town of Luraan
is included, (Pettinato p. 207), which is the same as Luram in the Book of Mormon but with a slightly different suffix which can be variable. It is a close match.
PREFIX ‘Zar':
ZARAHEMLA
The prefix ‘Zar' or
"Zara' found in the Book of Mormon
name Zarahemla, (Omni 1:12) is found
in third millennium inscriptions at Nagar in the name ‘zar-a-ni-um', in this name the suffix
‘um', is a mimation found in Jaredite names, it stands for a ‘God's Name',
GN. It is one of the toponyms or names attested to in the Ebla texts of places in
the region of Nagar which had rulers
with such names to whom "shipments of silver to the king of Nagar and eight of
his vassal cities," were recorded. (Eidem p. 101, in Oates 2001) The list included the name na-bat-ti-um,
for Nabada. (Erickson 22 Feb 2006) A nearby city, Zar-a-ni-um, was likely
located east of Nagar. At that time "Nagar may have been one of several large
Khabur kingdoms in late pre-Sargonic times [about 2300 BC] ...one which
controlled the western portion...Nagar was preeminent in the period covered by
the Ebla
texts." (Eidem p. 101 in Oates 2001) The
Ebla name lists
include two names with the prefix
element ‘zara', Zaraan, meaning ‘liar', and Zaranu,
also meaning ‘liar'. The suffix ‘hemla' has similarity with Hemti-ili
in the Neo-Assyrian name lists, meaning ‘My ardour is my god'. (Baker p. 471)
In the Ebla name lists the names Zaran, Zarri, Zarrum and Zaranu, all meaning ‘Liar' all have the
prefix ‘Zara' or ‘Zar'. Also in the Ebla lists are the names Zarbatu and zarbat both refer to an
Euphrates Poplar. (Pagan pp. 383-384) "Both informal and formal languages contain
variables as well as constants. By definition, a constant is a symbol that
keeps the same meaning across contexts. A variable, by definition keeps the
same meaning throughout any one context." (Altman p. 110) This is also true of prefixes and suffixes, vowels.
The full prefix of Zarahemla is Zarah
which in Hebrew means ‘Rising light'. (Genesis 38:30) Zarah
in the Tanakh was one of the twin sons of Judah and Tamar. Zarah had the scarlet thread tied about his arm as his hand came
out first. (Numbers 26:20) A later descendant, Jeuel, was the leader of a clan
settling in Jerusalem
after the Babylonian Exile. (l Chron. 9:6; Mandel p. 536)
THIRD
MILLENNIUM INSCRIPTIONS
Some of the Mallowan tablets of 1930
were published in 1940 by Gadd, then Loretz published others in 1969, Oates and
others published some of their findings, most of what was available or had
become available was included in the work of Finkel and Illingworth, most of
which, updated, appears in the Oates' work of 2001. (Oates p. 102). That is the
main source for Part l of these studies. Most of the tablets available come from the
period of Akkadian control in the Third Millennium with a high incidence of
Akkadian personal names. (Oates P. 102) Most of these names are from bullae or
sealings. (Eidem p. 103)
At the time of Nagar, the northern
Mesopotamians had adapted the southern Sumerian writing system of cuniform, but
that "system needed a very large number of symbols. The Akkadian move to a phonetic-based
system reduced the number needed to express the spoken word. The Phoenician
system, [of which Urgaritic is part] brought the number down to twenty-two
symbols plus five final forms. Our modern English alphabetic system is a finite collection [or reduction] of
fifty-two graphic symbols." Altman p. 110) It was the Sumerians who "divided
the day into 24 hours, the hour into 60 minutes, the minutes into 60 seconds,
and the circle into 360 degrees." (Altman p. 17) This set the stage for everybody else.
Writing was widespread and effective. "These ancient Sumerian, Lagashian,
Akkadian, Ugaritic, Phoenician, Moabite, Edomites, pre-Exilic Hebrew and
Babylonian societies were literate in the modern meaning of the word. They left
an enormous number of records for us to read-more than five million tablets."
(Altman p.18) The problem has been in getting them translated and published.
The Jaredite records go back to these
early periods and the Brass Plates, reflecting everything back to the
beginning, and the personal writings and abridgements of Mormon and Moroni places the Book of
Mormon among the world's greatest literature. The names so unique in the Book
of Mormon are among the most positive authentication of this. "The Sumerian writing system is called a syllabary. Each symbol in a syllabary
stands for a consonant and a vowel...The earliest tablets show that the
Sumerian already used
syllabograms, (symbols representing the
spoken consonant-plus-vowel)."
(Altman p. 21) The oldest cities and
their tablets in the Near East have names that
are found in the Book of Mormon. The
names confirm the veracity and historical claims of the Book of Mormon. The
final version of the Book of Mormon was written in ‘Reformed Egyptian', (Morm
9:32) which may very well have been Phoenicianized-Egyptian. (Erickson 18 May
2005) "The Phoenician writing system was compact, comprehensive, economical,
and practical." (Altman p. 37) Just like
the Book of Mormon. The Sumerians as the first to utilize writing systems may have
this ‘First' challenged by the civilization of the Indus Valley...[Mohenjo-daro,
Harappa]which remains to be interpreted. (Wheeler p. 10, 40) The tablets of
Nabada and Nagar show that they were trading with the Indus Valley
civilizations. This is remarkable. This has been mentioned in early entries to
this series. So far, no Book of Mormon
names are found in the Indus sources, but
then, most of the writings of that region have not been translated yet. But
time will tell. There are no claims in the Book of Mormon for a geographical relationship
to the Indus Valley,
but there are many for the Near East and Egypt.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Akkermans, Peter
M. M.G., & Glenn M., Schwartz, The
Archaeology of Syria, Cambridge, Cambridge,
University Press, Cambridge,
New York, 2003
Altman, Rochelle,
Absent Voices: The Story of Writing
Systems in the West, Oak Knoll Press, New
Castle, Delaware,
2004
Arnold, David,
Who Were the Babylonians, Society of
biblical Literature, Atlanta 2004
Baker, Heather D., ED. The Prosopography of the Neo-Assyrian Empire Vol. 2/ Part l, H-K, The
Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project, University
of Helsinki, Finland
2000
Benz, Frank l., Personal Names in the Phoenician and Punic
Inscriptions, Biblical Institute Press, Rome, 1972
Di Vito, Robert
A., Studies in the Third Millennium
Sumerian and Akkadian Personal Names, Studia
Pohl: Series Maior, No. 16, Editrice
Pontificio Instituto Biblico, Roma, 1993
Doresse, Jean, The Secret Books of the Egyptian Gnostics, The
Viking Press, New York
1960
Eidem, Jesper,
Irving Finkel & Marco Bonechi, The
Third Millennium Inscriptions, in Oates 2001
Erickson, Einar
C., The Ancient City
of Nabada, Web Site, 22 Feb 2006
.............The Governor's
Archive from the Ancient City of Nippur,
Web 10 Aug 2005
.........The Ancient Kingdom of Kish, the Jaredites & the Brass
Plates, Web 10 Aug
05
.............Reformed Egyptian: The Phoenician Connection. 18
May 2005
.............The Ancient City of Nagar, Web Site,
29 March 2006
..............Ancient Tell Abu
Salabikh, Web Site April 2006
Gelb, Ignace J., Computer-aided Analysis of Amorite, The
Oriental Institute of The University of Chicago, Assyriological Studies No. 21,
Chicago, Ill., 1980
Largey, Dennis
L., Ed. Book of Mormon Reference
Companion, Deseret Book Co., Salt Lake City, Utah 2003
Leick, Gwendolyn,
Who's Who in the Ancient Near East, Routledge, New
York, 2002
Liverani, Mario, Uruk: The First
City, Equinox, David Brown, Oakville, Ct.,
2006
Mandel, David, Who's Who in the Tanakh, Aerial Books, Savyon, Israel,
2004
Nibley, Hugh, An Approach to the Book of Mormon, The
Collected Works of Hugh Nibley: Vol. 6. FARMS, Deseret Book Company, Salt Lake City, Utah
1988
Oates, David,
Joan Oates, and Helen McDonald, Excavations
at Tell Brak, Vol. 2 Nagar
in the Third
Millennium BC., British School of Archaeology in Iraq. University
of Cambridge, Cambridge, 2001
Pettinato,
Giovanni, Ebla: A new Look at History, John Hopkins
University Press, Baltimore,
1991
Radner, Karen, The Prosopography of The Neo-Assyrian
Empire, The Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project, Vol l/l. A. University
of Helsinki, Finland
, 1998
Roaf, Michael, Cultural Atlas of Mesopotamia
and the Ancient Near East, Facts on File, Inc., New York 2004
Saggs, H. W. F., The Babylonians, The Folio Society, London,
Sallaberger,
Walther, & Jason Ur, Tell
Beydar/Nabada in its Regional Setting, In Lucio Mano, Walther Sallaberger,
Philippe Talon & Karel Van Lerberghe, Third
Millennium Cuniform Texts from Tell Beydar (Seasons 1996-2002), SUBARTU XII, Brepols, Belgium
2004
Sallaberger,
Walther, Women at Beydar, in Lucio Milano, et al
Ed. Millennium Cuniform Texts from
Tell Beydar (Seasons 1996-2002) SUBARTU
XII, Brepols, Belgium 2004
Wheeler, Sir
Mortimer, Civilizations of the Indus Valley
and Beyond, Thames and Hudson, London, 1966
Whitehouse, Ruth,
D., The Facts on File Dictionary of Archaeology,
Facts on File Publications, New
York, 1983
|